Members' Union

Nautilus_Lightblast 2022-05-02 03:57:57 UTC #1322

I was unaware of this regulation, and will do my best to adhere to it in the future.

Thank you for your vigilant warning.

Hanna_Brassheart 2022-05-02 04:01:36 UTC #1323

Thank you for hearing and helping keep the forums running well
It may seem as though the rules posts are rather scattered around, but they are summarized here: https://forums.theaetherlight.com/t/welcome-to-the-forums-a-general-guide/7688/2?u=hanna_brassheart

Beckendorf_Direscope 2022-05-19 22:30:50 UTC #1324

@Cinnar_Ratchetloop
I had to edit your post on Law 'n Order for brief mild language. I hope that you understand.

Iliara_Mustardtop 2022-05-19 22:42:19 UTC #1325

I--how is lord language? I understand if someone was using it as referring to THE Lord, but Lord is a title and also a common usage noun lol

Beckendorf_Direscope 2022-05-20 00:35:52 UTC #1326

I assumed, since it is commonly used as a profane reference to God, that it isn't allowed.
I guess the weight associated with it varies from place to place, and personally I consider it slightly more innapropriate than other words that we sensor.

Hans_Oddcraft 2022-05-20 00:39:43 UTC #1327

I agree with @Beckendorf_Direscope.

Sierepica_Fuzzywalker 2022-05-20 01:14:36 UTC #1328

Hmm. If I say “Lord Haversham went to the inn,” I don’t think that should be censored. Miss Ratchetloop’s post seems to mix the swear word usage with the medieval title usage I have just demonstrated. headscratch

Iliara_Mustardtop 2022-05-20 01:16:41 UTC #1329

I made that edit at her request, since she told me directly that she wasn't using it in the reference-to-God manner.

Beckendorf_Direscope 2022-05-20 01:35:05 UTC #1330

She was addressing a lord? I thought she was using it as profanity.

Iliara_Mustardtop 2022-05-20 01:59:58 UTC #1331

She was not using it as profanity, nor was she addressing a lord, but she thought the edit would be funny to emphasize that she wasn't using it in a profane manner.

Hans_Oddcraft 2022-05-20 05:05:27 UTC #1332

I would be concerned for the witness we are setting by allowing something like that considering social connotations.

Ethan_Burnkeep 2022-05-24 14:01:23 UTC #1333

Hey there @Hammerhead_Crinkleporridge , please do not double post, as you did here:

And here as a triple post

If you absolutely have to, please use SFTDP, ( Sorry For The Double Post), or SFTTP ( Sorry For The Triple Post).

Thank you

Hammerhead_Crinkleporridge 2022-05-24 17:03:26 UTC #1334

Sorry about that.

Ethan_Burnkeep 2022-05-24 22:21:07 UTC #1335

It's ok bro! We all forget sometimes! You're good

Beckendorf_Direscope 2022-05-24 23:38:56 UTC #1336

You're fine, man.

Hammerhead_Crinkleporridge 2022-05-25 16:59:37 UTC #1337

Ok . Ill try not to do that again.

Beckendorf_Direscope 2022-05-26 00:43:58 UTC #1338

2 posts were merged into an existing topic: Capes and Codes [SPOILERS]

Hanna_Brassheart 2022-05-27 08:45:28 UTC #1339

@Emman_Jumpsong1, I don't think your most recent true/false poll is an appropriate subject to post here. Even if the answer is false, I don't think those ideas should be here and normalized this way. We want to encourage Biblical values. Seems like sketchy waters.

Sierepica_Fuzzywalker 2022-05-27 17:19:52 UTC #1340

I’m pretty sure it was a joke.

Also, all of the responses to said poll firmly said that was a terrible idea and a tragedy if it had indeed occurred, so I’m pretty sure we are promoting Biblical values at the moment. Nobody is suggesting is that is a good idea.

Emman_Jumpsong1 2022-05-27 18:45:26 UTC #1341

Understandable. I was thinking it would be funny if someone answered true, since it is something we would never do. And my fiancée had a talk with me after she saw it too; so the humour back fired on me.

Yeah, but Hanna and My fiancée have the same opinion.