Law and Order! Or a good place for a friendly argument

[Beth_Applemine]

Hi there! I'm new

Bunnies are absolutely, without a doubt the cutest wittle things ever!

-Has doubts-

How can you argue with this?

In case you couldn't tell, I'm biased. XD

[Beckendorf_Direscope]

Squirrels are a close second for best thing in nature.

[Danyul_Braziervest]

NOPE it's the elephants that take the prize for being the cutest/noblest creatures!!

[Rex_Blackdash]

Uhm, you're mistaken, ma'am.

{https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=cute+bunny+images&&view=detail&mid=0AD73558D7B995FCB7770AD73558D7B995FCB777&&FORM=VRDGAR&ru=%2Fvideos%2Fsearch%3Fq%3Dcute%2Bbunny%2Bimages%26FORM%3DHDRSC3}

[Beth_Applemine]

_ insert medal for watching entire ten minute montage of bunnies being cute here _

Yeah bunnies are cute, but for me, athletic daredevil/ acorn-chomping squirrels win.

I also think chipmunks are one of the cutest animals. I mean, look:

And they make this noise, which for some reason I really like:

[https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gqKCwwl8Rks]

[Danyul_Braziervest]

The chipmunks squeaks were too high for my poor ears to hear

But they are very cute. Why do you think Alvin and his brothers got so popular? @Rex_Blackdash Name a bunny character cuter than them (and no I don't think Bugs Bunny is that cute)

[Rex_Blackdash]

I never really thought Alvin and the Chipmunks were cute, but to each his own.

And your question: there aren't many bunny characters, at least in the stuff I watch, so I can't really answer that. But bunnies in general are just so cute. I rest my case.

[Jayhawk_Greencape]

Okay... Since returning from film camp I have decided that unless you have had been put into the shoes of the crew, you shouldn't criticize a film.

[Jayhawk_Greencape]

(IDEK why I posted that past post here...)

Who else is glad that they don't allow the reading of the Bible in public schools anymore?

[Beth_Applemine]

They don't allow it... at all?

[Eerie_Coppernight]

I'm curious, why would that be a good thing?

[Sierepica_Fuzzywalker]

I am not glad of this. Are they actually making it so students can’t bring Bibles to school and read them? What happened to the First Amendment? Is the Bible “hate speech” now?

Source please.

I'm curious, why would that be a good thing?

My sarcasm meter is reading the likelihood of exasperated sarcasm at 65% as regards Mr. Jayhawk’s post.

[Beth_Applemine]

My sarcasm meter is reading the likelihood of exasperated sarcasm at 65% as regards Mr. Jayhawk’s post.

Judging by the fact that he runs the Bible reading topic, I’d rate it 100% sarcasm.

[Jayhawk_Greencape]

Actually, it's 0% sarcasm. :0)

The fact that they don't allow the reading of the bible in schools (At least a teacher doing so), I think, is a good thing, because that means that they are neutral towards religion, and while that may seem bad initially, them doing that is essentially letting us do whatever we want with religion. (Except force it on others, and let's be real, if they read the Quran every morning at your school, I'm sure you and some others I won't care to name wouldn't be happy.)

@Sierepica_Fuzzywalker:
[https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/671/pfeiffer-v-board-of-education]
One of several. This is technically part of the first amendment.

First, while it is constitutional for public schools to teach children about religion, it is unconstitutional to use public schools to advance particular religious beliefs. Among the important statements made in the guidelines are: "The school's approach to religion is academic, not devotional."

Basically, not only bible reading in class is unconstitutional, but so is reading any other religious text in pursuit of forcing religion on someone. This still allows kids to bring their Bibles and talk to their classmates about their beliefs, and even pray! I just think it shows that we have a government that is trying to be the best it can be. :0)